As we sit a day before the next Israeli election we, in
Chutz La’aretz, wait to see what might happen...again. The
“Anything But Bibi” campaign (deemed so by Rabbi Moshe Grylak in his article
“For a Case of Whiskey”), is focused on the indictments Netanyahu faces,
personal corruption charges and the ethical concerns. I am not taking any
political stance, but here comes the question, can one put aside the ethics and
focus on the successes that Netanyahu has brought to Israel economically and
politically?
Here in America, we have faced a similar
dilemma as we recently lived through President Trump’s impeachment. Eytan Kobre
in his article “Independence Day” in Mishpacha Magazine points out that
a recent Gallup Survey indicated that 75% of Democrats responded that it was
more important to them that the president set a good moral example than their
agreeing with his policies. 19% said it was more important to agree with the
president’s views. Among Republicans, only 30% stressed the significance
of an upright moral character versus 60% who said that it was more important to
agree with the president on issues.
Interestingly enough, in 1999 when President Clinton was just impeached,
the opposite was found. At the time, 75%
of Republicans said that presidential morality was more important and only
36% of Democrats did. Clearly,
says Kobre, Democrats only care about
morality when a Republican is president and Republicans only care when a
Democrat is president. Partisan politics
affects morality. Independents seem to have more consistency. During both Clinton’s and Trump’s
presidencies a majority of independents said they opted for ethical integrity
over political agreement. Right is right no matter who, no matter what
and no matter when.
As the American election comes in
November, we consider the same question that the Israelis are facing tomorrow
in Israel. Can one reason that in this case, since we need this president’s
policies that morality does not apply? Again, I am not here to take any
political stance, nor to share who I am supporting, but to share how we might
apply this question as a parent. And,
here, is what I like to call, two “teachable moments” in current events.
In
8th grade Advisory, we linked this issue to the Astros cheating scandal.
Just to summarize, in 2017 and 2018 the Astros illegally stole signs from the
opposing teams. Using a video
camera in center field they
filmed the opposing catchers' signs to the pitchers. Then Astros’ staff watching the live camera
feed behind the dugout would then signal to their batter what
kind of pitch was coming. Should the Astros be stripped of
their World Series title? Until now that has not happened as they maintain that
they did not steal signs during the world series.
So, we asked, can one still rejoice and root for the
Astros knowing what they did? Whom do we admire? Is there a difference
between a hero and a celebrity? Can someone who does something immoral still be
a hero? When a celebrity does something that disappoints
me ethically, does he/she stop being my role model? There was much discussion on this topic after
the death of Kobe Bryant who was hailed as a hero, while some maintained that
people seem to have forgotten his being accused of rape in 2004.
Children begin hero worship at a young age. Freud
identified what he called the “ego ideal” - the image of the ideal to which we
aspire to become. It is often is represented by actual people in our
environment. Our first ego ideal is generally our parents. As we get older we move away from our parents
and seek out ego ideals in our environment. When we are younger, teens, those
ego ideals may not be as realistic and are found in a world of fantasy, (i.e.
superheroes, athletes). At that time, celebrities and peers become our role
models.
As
parents, we can discuss these ego ideals with our children. We ask our
children to identify who their heroes are.
Whom do they admire? What qualities make them admirable? When we
speak to our children about their heroes we should make them focus on those
qualities and identify whether that person has those qualities. By having
these conversations we can also help our children identify with these qualities
of bravery, compassion, kindness, etc and develop them within themselves. We can show them they can be
heroes too. What great qualities do they
and can they possess?
The celebrities to which our children are exposed in the
media- including social media- are often not the role models we strive for them
to emulate. The ego ideal in their fantasy moves into reality. At times, they aspire towards an ego ideal
that is unrealistic or even dangerous.
One such example might be a girl aspiring to be like a supermodel.
This can lead to a superficial focus on looks and even dangerous and unhealthy
dieting. Other role models may be
negative in promiscuous behavior or antisocial behavior. It is therefore important to have frank
conversations about the qualities of celebrities and what we do not admire.
We
need to talk to our children about our own role models- who inspires us and
why. That list might include everyday people in our lives, religious role
models etc. Tell them what qualities
inspire you.
Yvette
Miller in her article “Finding Heroes For Our Children” maintains the
importance of constantly speaking to our children about worthy role models, “ My kids were very young at the time, and I
resolved to try to make our home one where these timeless Jewish qualities are
the ones that are admired. Several years on, I’m still trying. I make an effort
to mention examples of good deeds, to get my kids excited about the many
examples of selfless behavior, caring, and actions on behalf of others that fill
our community. To admire the neighbor who works with handicapped children. To
laud the woman who cooks lunch for our synagogue each week; to congratulate the
local rabbi who volunteers his time to tutor local kids in Jewish subjects.
Sometimes we’re out of step with the news that’s fueling the national conversation,
but I feel good that the “heroes” my kids are learning to admire are people who
try to make the world a better place.”
Are parents only role
models for young children? 1,100 12 to 18 year olds were surveyed in the
Weekly Reader Research Study, about 10 years ago. The survey found that “
67.7 percent of the teenagers said parents are the most influential role
models in their lives. After parents, 40.6 percent said teachers and coaches
followed by siblings at 40.4 percent. Religious leaders, athletes, and
celebrities were 18.7 percent, 18.3 percent and 16.5 percent, respectively.
When choosing role models, the teenagers surveyed said the most important
qualities they look for include values such as honesty, integrity, loyalty and
truthfulness.
A recent University of Phoenix's study has replicated similar results. 47% of respondents
identified their father as their role models. 41% identified their
mothers. A favorite teacher was identified by 41%. (In the list of top 10
role models, celebrities were fourth in the list after parents and
teachers). 81% of people said their role model influenced a major life
decision. 55% said that when things got tough and they were tempted to quit
their role model encouraged them to continue.
In a 1993 Nike
commercial Charles Barkley, basketball star, said, “I am not a role model. I’m
not paid to be a role model. I am paid to wreak havoc on the basketball court.
Parents should be role models. Just because I dunk a basketball doesn’t mean I
should raise your kids.” While we know that celebrities are role models
by default, the truth is that we are the primary role models for our children,
while they might hate to admit it!
Advisory Update:
Sixth Grade: Students focused on organizing an efficient at- home workspace.
Seventh Grade: Students learned some strategies for upbeat
thinking.
Eighth Grade: Students began a unit on parent-child relationships
No comments:
Post a Comment